BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL 1
The heading ofthe article is quite comprehensive since it shows key variables suchas improving blood pressure. Furthermore, the title reveals the studypopulation as a randomized controlled trial.
The abstractsummarized the aims of the study, background, design, methods,results, and conclusion. In fact, each section was covered clearlyand concisely.
The study showedthe importance of managing persons with diabetes, hypertension, andchronic kidney disease (Williams et al., 2012). Moreover, the authorsstated their hypothesis explicitly while discussing the aims of thetrial. Although the literature review was based on old sources, itprovided a firm basis for the research.
Indeed, ethicsapproval was sought from and granted by the Human Research EthicsCommittee of the particular hospital. Therefore, sufficient measureswere taken to protect the rights of the study participants.
In-depth analysiswas undertaken to test the stated hypothesis. The study usedappropriate statistical methods sufficient for the number ofparticipants and variables. Granted, the trial did not presentinformation concerning effect size and precision of estimates.
The primaryfindings were interpreted within the context of previous research.The authors acknowledged that subsequent studies had to useaffordable and non-obtrusive measures of medical adherence such asprescription refills. The researchers also identified severalimplications for practice. For example, the change in systolic bloodpressure was presumed to have clinical significance.
Notably, thereport was well-written and organized such that a reader couldconduct sufficient critical analysis. Furthermore, the researchershave substantive qualifications and experience that inspireconfidence in their findings. For instance, Allison William is anassociate professor at Monash University while Elizabeth Manias is aprofessor at The University of Melbourne. However, the study waslimited in relation to the sample size. Non-English speakers had alsobeen excluded from data collection. Despite such shortcomings, thefindings seem valid since they were backed by adequate research.Consequently, the evidence presented is useful to the nursingdiscipline.
Williams, A., Manias, E., Walker, R., & Gorelik, A. (2012). Amultifactorial intervention to improve blood pressure control inco-existing diabetes and kidney disease: a feasibility randomizedcontrolled trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(11),2515-2525. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05950.x