Death Penalty versus Life Sentence

DeathPenalty versus Life Sentence

DeathPenalty versus Life Sentence

TheUnited States is among the top countries that execute prisoners.However, prison trends indicate that it is becoming more challengingto kill prisoners in America. 328 individuals were given the deathsentence in 1994 in America. This number dropped to 111 in 2008. Manyprisoners who are given the death sentence are not killed. The stateof California for example, has only executed 13 prisoners since1974. Currently, the state has 714 prisoners on death row (Amanda,2012). Most people who are sentenced to death die because of old ageor health conditions.

Thecapital punishment in the United States has become a costly project.This is because execution is very expensive and it is also a timeinvolving punishment. For every death sentence, the justice systemexperiences long trials, intense judicial review, and costly appeals(Amanda, 2012). The longer the death row case, review, and appeals,the greater the legal costs.

Itis advisable for states to replace the capital punishment with thelife sentence. The death penalty is costly to maintain, and it isaffected by errors or misrepresentation of facts in some cases. 138death row prisoners have been exonerated in the United States. Somepeople consider the death penalty as too soft, and it should bereplaced with the harsher life sentence. Some of the family membersof people killed by the death row prisoners explain that the deathpenalty inflicts brief pain. They prefer to see the death rowconvicts suffering in the prison for many years until death (Amanda,2012).

Alife sentence without parole completely separates the death rowinmate from the outside society. The prisoner is not rehabilitatedbecause he or she will never be reintroduced in the community.Efforts should, therefore, be made to replace the capital punishmentwith the harsher and less costly life sentence.


Amanda,H. (2012). Penalty vs. Life without Parole. Retrieved from