“Herstory”

“Herstory”

Anindividual can identify the cultural ideology of society through itslanguage. The linguistics also structure sexuality through genderedterminologies. Many expressions also originate from sex-exclusivelanguage, and this is the reason ‘history’ might be perceived assuch a term. History does not, however, discredit femaleemotionality, as it illustrates some of the achievement that womenhad. “Herstory” does not have a significant contribution to thecommunication about gender and sex.

Culturedetermines the linguistic categories present in society. The use oflanguage in many civilizations is gendered, and it constructs domainsof sexual category (Litosseliti 73). The terminologies that males usein most languages could be different from those utilized by females,and this illustrates the significance of traditions in linguisticanalysis. Even though verbal communication might portray sexism,“herstory” does not have a significant role to the lingo aboutgender. Sexual characteristics discourses have to be recognizable,interconnected, and ideological (Litosseliti 58). However, historydoes not openly discredit female emotionality, and one cannot claimthat the term only describes the successes that men had in the past.

Althoughone might perceive history as a gendered term, it is a reflection ofreality. Terministic screens refer to the combination of differentwords with the aim of getting people’s attention and distract themfrom others (DeFrancisco and Palczewski 110). The use of “herstory”does not quickly form a terministic screen that alters anindividual’s perceptions of the past. Communication should be areflection of the reality, and it also has to be selective of therealistic aspects (DeFrancisco and Palczewski 110). The word‘herstory’, however, would not likely create new identities byhaving a different discourse. The terministic screen generated by theword can only make people consider women’s contribution inhistorical times, but it cannot deflect them from the reality.

Thestandpoint theory is a philosophy that challenges the masculinediscourse which is also dominant (Litosseliti 114). This methodologyalso focusses on power relations and explores knowledge from thepoint of view that women have. Evidently, those who introduced theterm ‘herstory’ did so after the society was used to the historyterminology. Even though men dominate the historical accounts,‘herstory’ cannot influence the society to make choices thatwould promote the construction of gendered selves. Moreover, thedominant groups in the society have to accept the ideas presented bynew terms, and this might not be possible due to the non-dominantgroups’ muted positions (DeFrancisco and Palczewski 113).

Speechcommunity refers to the collection of people who have a standarddialect (Litosseliti 41). The ‘herstory’ terminology reflects thechoices that women have in their social networks, and it might nothave a valuable contribution to gendered language. ‘Herstory’over-emphasizes on gender differences and this is an aspect thatmight make it less influential. The term would also overlook thegender similarities that history presents, hence, establishing abinary opposition that fails to make the name have a valuablecontribution to communication.

Conclusion

“Herstory”does not have a significant contribution to the communication aboutgender and since sexual discourses have to be recognizable,interconnected, and ideological. Besides, the use of “herstory”would not quickly form a terministic screen would alter the waypeople think about the events that occurred in the past. Males’dominance of historical accounts would not make ‘herstory’ havean influence on the society in making choices that would promote theconstruction of gendered selves.

WorksCited

DeFrancisco,Victoria, and Palczewski, Catherine. CommunicatingGender Diversity: A Critical Approach.Sage Publications. 2007.

Litosseliti,Lia. Genderand Language: Theory and Practice.New York: Routledge. 2014.