Goodgovernance is a recipe for success in any organization. However, itis influenced by factors such as personal principles and beliefs.Leaders can be categorized differently based on their beliefs ortheories. The most common types are transformational and servantleadership. Transformational leaders inspire change while the laterinitiates projects that will lead to realization of goals. This paperdiscusses these two leadership theories. It compares them toqualities portrayed by my school principal. Lastly, it contrasts myleadership skills to hers. The last section of the paper highlightsimportant lessons learned from the exercise.
Leadership analysis 4
Transformational leadership 4
Comparison to chosen leader 6
Comparison to self 7
Servant leadership 8
Advantage and disadvantages 9
Comparison to my chosen leader 9
Comparison to self 11
Leadership is vital for anyorganization. Leaders are tasked with ensuring that the goals of theorganizations are met. Additionally, since junior employees look upto them for inspiration, it is evident that they should be people ofgood characters. Leaders can be classified based on different traitsthat they possess. In many organizations, leaders can be categorizedas either transformational or servant leadership. The type ofleadership that one chooses is based on personal principles andbeliefs. It is also common to find that some leaders do not fall intoeither of the two categories. If they possess negative attributesthey are said to be a poor leader. In such organizations, workers areunmotivated and there are high rates of absenteeism, low workproductivity and poor relations among workers. For more efficiency,organizations should always strive to have good leaders who encouragetheir employees.
Leadership analysis Transformational leadershipAssumptions
According to this leadershiptheory, employees will follow an inspirational leader. This visionaryleader with passion will be able to realize any goals but to achievethem he or she must have positive energy and share it.Transformational leadership is very important in organizations wherethe juniors look up to those in power for influence.
Transformational leadership haspositive energy that will make the employees work with the leadertowards the realization of the organization’s goals. The leader ispassionate about success and also cares about their employees.Transformational leadership begins with the definition and refinementof a vision that will incite the masses to follow them (Allio, 2012).Employees monitor the leader because they share similar ideologiesand beliefs. In this leadership theory, the vision may be from theemployees or the management. However, those in managerial positionscan easily adopt it without biases. The leader will sell the visionto remove any doubt and ensure that the views are reinforced in theirminds (Northouse, 2015). Integrity and transparency of the leader arecrucial because other junior employees look up to him or her forinspiration.
Transformational leadershipinvolves believing that one will achieve his or her goals andobjectives because the employees are loyal to the one in charge.This means that for it to be fully adopted in an organization,teamwork has an essential role to play. There is minimal competitionand as a result, no one is bothered by fame and special recognition.The leader must repeatedly remind and encourage their followers thatthey will succeed if they put their effort and commitment towards thevision. A transformational leader also encourages members byrecognizing any effort that aims at progress (Lapid-Bogda, 2007). Theleader gives equal attention to the goal and the mental state offollowers. The employees reciprocate by being loyal and committed tomeeting the goals of the organization. It is, therefore, evident thattransformational leadership is people oriented and works on thenotion that success will be achieved if followers are deeplycommitted.
Transformational leadership hasfour major components they include idealized influence, Intellectualstimulation and Intellectual stimulation. In idealized influence,the leader leads byexample, and the others follow. There is a lot of admiration for theleader and he or she has a strong conviction. Additionally, theleader is good at pleading with followers (Parris& Peachey, 2013).The leader displays the theory conviction not only through theirwords but action. The leader’s action, in turn, inspires thefollower. Intellectual stimulation, on the other hand, entails beinginnovation and creativity. The leader is ready to take risks andbelieve in others. The workers should feel free to engage in any ideathat they think will be of benefit to the organization. The pros ofhaving employees command their destiny are that it creates loyalty,and there is the individual responsibility (Northouse, 2015). Thismeans that in the case of any problems in the future, one is heldaccountable for his own wrong doings. Once the followers have thefeeling that they can use creativity, they will easily tackle anyobstacles that may hinder the achievement of the goals. The result isincreased productivity or work output. In Individual consideration,the leader should be able to listen to every follower’s needs orconcerns (Lapid-Bogda, 2007). This involves acknowledging of theindividual’s strength and weakness. It entails knowing that thediversity of talent and skill is an advantage and is not part of theproblem. This style allows followers to develop in character and haveself-worth that allows them to grow and achieve.
Comparison to chosen leader
From the above description, it isevident that my principal, Miss Camilie Darden cannot be categorizedas a transformational leader. It is explained that transformationalleaders enjoy working with others and can accommodate diverseopinion. Miss Camilie Darden fails to meet these criteria because shehas no consideration for her subordinates and does not listen toanyone. In most cases, her decision is the final. Furthermore, shemakes decisions without considering anyone. Her decisions are oftenbiased and against certain people, which is a good indication thatshe does not value teamwork. Additionally, her characters demonstratethat she enjoys an authoritarian or autocratic style of leadership.Leaders who adopt such styles face a lot of resistance from within asthe case with Miss Camilie Darden. She is often forced to superviseother workers to get things done even though her position should beconfined to managerial roles. Additionally, Miss Camilie Darden failsto be a transformational leaders because such leaders tend to inspirechange and being on the lead. She however meets the description of ajealous leader who is heart broken by the success of other people.Being on top is her most valuable possession because there, sheconsiders herself immune and untouchable.
If she was a transformationalleader, she could be listening to the views of others and puttingmechanisms of ensuring that all the suggestions and ideas that otherpeople come up with are implemented. Schools usually have weekly,monthly and annual meetings. These events give both teachings andnon-teaching staff to air their opinion and make suggestions. Innormal cases and where the leadership is effective, mechanism areusually set to ensure that there are correct implementation programs.Additionally, there are regular follow ups that are aimed at ensuringthat everything is as planned. In the case of Miss Camilie Darden,the administration barely has the appropriate departments that aregiven such tasks. This is a good indication of a failed leadershipwhich is left unchecked can lead to the closure of the facility dueto poor leadership. Consequently, transformational leaders tend toencourage other to follow their leadership willingly. It is evidentthat she lacks all of these qualities. Transformational leaders areunique because they consult their subordinates on matters regardingdecision making and appreciate personal unique skill and abilities. Acharacter which Miss Camilie Darden abundantly lacks. In conclusion,Miss Camilie Darden’s leadership style is not transformational.
Comparison to self
Although I cannot comfortably saythat I belong to this category of leaders, I believe that I possesssome of its properties. For instance, I believe in teamwork and theneed to inspire others who share similar ideologies. The reason why Ibelieve in team work is because when people come together, they tendto find effective methods of solving various problems. Additionally,team work gives a sense of belong to the team members and thusmotivating workers. Consequently, I am open to criticism because itis what builds us. Another property of a transformational leader thatI possess is that I value collective success. This character hasenabled me to be more decisive in that I can easily designate jobs. Perhaps I only fail to be a transformational leader because I changeaccording to the situation and state of my subordinates. I believethat there are some situations that require one to be servant leadersand limiting oneself to specific style can disadvantage personalreputation and public image. Again I can say that I am not atransformational leader because I believe in getting things donemyself. My life experiences have taught me that if you want to getthings done effectively, one should always step in and offer thenecessary direction. Most of these attributes are lacking in myprincipal Miss Camilie Darden, and these are what makes us different. I meet the criteria of a transformation leader because I am veryvisionary and objective. This attributes have allowed me to be a goodplanner and interacting with others.
The leader is responsible for hisor her subordinates. Leaders who believe in this approach also havefaith in people. Savant leadership requires good will and commitment.
This leadership style hinges onthe notion that leaders are there to serve other, and it is not viceversa. Servant leaders believe that they help other by leading them(Allio, 2012). The theory pays special attention to the lessdisadvantaged members of the society and is a form of participatorystyle of leadership. Leaders involves the employees or subordinatesin the decision-making process, but when it comes to taking actions,they are at the front (Spears, 2011). The authoritarian styles ofleadership do not correspond with this type of leadership as it goesagainst the principle of guiding other and serving. The leaders guideand support the other to develop and realize their full potentials.
Servant leadership is committedto helping other, and this is what drives such leaders. This type ofleadership is very moral, and the leader places subordinates beforethe organization’s goals. The wellbeing of the others matters morethan the leader`s interest (Spears, 2011). Members also makesacrifices for the sake others and thus, indicating the spirit ofcollaboration. Servant leadership is a good model for those who workin nonprofit organizations or public sectors. Servant leadership isalso the theme of religious leadership. Many Christian organizationshave adopted it because it abides by religious teachings onselflessness (Spears, 2011).
Advantage and disadvantages
This type of leadershippositively influences the society as the leaders serve the community.In this kind of leadership, the leaders build a long lasting trustwith the community and thus, creating a great corporate culture andrelation ("Leadership styles," 2015). Such leaders alsoinspire subordinates to work harder towards their goal. Subordinatesto such leadership are also proud to be identified with suchorganizations as they are doing well to the community. The maindisadvantage of this technique is that it creates a lot ofdependencies, and there are very few people who exhibit suchcharacters.
Comparison to my chosen leader
Certainly, Miss Camilie Darden isnot a servant leader. Everything she does is not because she wants tolead by example, it is based on selfish disaster. The style ofleadership that she embraces is the classic authoritarian type wherehierarchy is strictly enforced, and the leader dictates what his orher juniors should do. One character that is unique in servantleadership is that the leader genuinely wants what is best for thesociety. Miss Camilie Darden is not kind hearted and is disturbed byother success. Since servant leadership aims at satisfying theorganization’s needs and not individual interest, such leadersshould embrace sharing of ideologies. All these are missing in MissCamille because he enjoys dominating. In servant leadership, thepeople come first before the mission, however in Miss CamilieDarden’s authoritarian style the mission comes first. AnAuthoritarian type of leadership also aims at achieving the missioncompared to servant leadership that aims at assisting the leastprivileged in society.
As is demonstrated in religiousreadings, leaders are usually ordained by God to serve and not theopposite. Miss Camilie Darden is usually not available to his juniorwho may be in need of professional advice. On the other hand, sinceshe cannot lead by actions there is no admiration for the leader andhe or she has no strong conviction. The result of this is that otherworkers are likely to see her as their enemy as opposed to theirleader. Additionally, Miss Camilie Darden lack of moral shows thatshe is not a servant leader. Even in small institutions with fewmembers, those in the top seats are always expected to be people whocan influence others. Another quality that Miss Camilie Darden lackedinterpersonal and communication skills. Mot leaders who have adequateinterpersonal skills rarely run into troubles with others.Additionally, they tend to know when to say yes and no. Miss CamilieDarden, on the other hand, accepts none of this characters.
Comparison to self
Personally,I can say that I am more of a servant than a transformational leader.This is because of my life experiences. Teaching special needsstudents require a lot of determination and understanding. The factthat I enjoy it means I want the best for these children.Additionally, I was brought up in a close-knit family where valuessuch as honesty, hard work, and critical thinking were greatlyemphasized. These experiences have enabled me to understand otherpeople who need help, I tap into their desire and encourage them tofollow their dreams. Unlike Miss Camilie Darden, I value otherpeople’s contributions. I believe that when people sit together andshare ideas, it results in even better solutions. This is becausewhen people unit, different ideologies are put in the table fordiscussion. The best is thus taken for consideration. Additionally, Ialso believe that good leaders should uphold high moral integrity.This means, leading my example and setting the pace in terms ofcharacter. In order to demonstrate my beliefs and intent in servantleadership, I help others when faced with financial, economic andsocial challenges.
Additionally, a major differencebetween us is that before I react, I take some time to think. I tryto put myself in the other person’s shoes, and if the claim isgenuine, I easily forgive and let things go. On the other hand, whenI feel that I have really been wronged by another person, sometimes Iprefer going a bit silent and thinking over the matter. If the casecan be assumed, I prefer to agree to disagree as opposed to use ofviolence or force. Although I may not fully meant be called aservant leader, I believe I possess a lot of the qualities, and thishas enabled me to stand out among my peers. The benfit of this actsis that, it tends to encourage other people to have the heart toforgive since unity is strenth.
In conclusion, it is evident thatproper leadership is critical in an organization. The two major typesof leadership that people often choose are transformational andservant leadership. I have learned transformational leadershipinvolves inspiring other to follow while in servant leadership, it isthe duty of the leader to lead. Additionally, I have learned thattransformational aims at a vision with considering subordinates butin servant leadership, the objective is to assist subordinates firstbefore vision. Servant leadership involves leadership that merelyoffers guidance to the society to develop themselves. On the otherhand transformational involves leading by example. Since myprincipal Miss Camilie Darden does not fall in any of the abovecategories, it is evident that she is a horrible leader. Leaders withsuch qualities have a lot of negative influence in an organization.When those in power uphold an authoritarian kind of leadership,junior employees tend to feel threatened, and this may reduce workoutput. Such organizations cannot also meet their goals andobjectives. Individually, although I do not fully fall in any ofthese categories, I believe that I possess several attributes thatare found on both sides.
Allio,R. (2012). Leaders and leadership – many theories, but what adviceis reliable? Strategy& Leadership, 41(1),4-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10878571311290016
Lapid-Bogda,G. (2007). Whattype of leader are you?New York: McGraw-Hill.
Leadershipstyles.(2015). Changingminds.org.Retrieved 15 September 2016, fromhttp://changingminds.org/disciplines/leadership/styles/leadership_styles.htm
Northouse,P. (2015). Leadership (7thEd.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Parris,D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review ofservant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journalof business ethics, 113(3),377-393.
Spears,L. (2011). Characterand Servant Leadership: Ten Characteristics of Effective, CaringLeaders(1st ed., pp. 25-30). Journal of Virtues and Leadership. Retrievedfromhttps://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/jvl/vol1_iss1/Spears_Final.pdf