EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW 1
RecoveringAddict and Employment Interview
The paper aims toexamine the responses obtained from a recovering addict concerningthe workplace environment. Subsequently, the information will be usedto develop an analysis of the identified social problem. Therespondent’s answers reveal the inherent challenges faced by formerdrug addicts with regards to securing and retaining employment.
I arranged tomeet the interviewee at a pizza shop since the venue had plenty ofspace and could allow for private conversation. The person I chose tointerview was a former colleague, who often discussed his workingenvironment. Therefore, I took the opportunity to use his employmentsituation for this assignment. I decided on the questions to askbased on his feelings about working in a helping profession. In thisregard, I inquired about how he felt concerning the job market. Ialso asked what line of work he would prefer if he had a choice.Furthermore, I wanted to know what he considered as the mostdifficult part of his job assignment. Inevitably, I asked him toexplain what he liked and disliked about his employment. I alsoinquired whether he felt valued at his workplace and if there wereopportunities for advancement.
The intervieweewas a direct service worker named James. Notably, the interviewsought to address the factors influencing a dysfunctional workingenvironment.
The intervieweefelt that the job market was excessively harsh on recovering addicts.In fact, individuals with criminal records were automatically barredfrom accessing certain positions of employment. Furthermore, thestigma associated with previous drug abuse would hinder them fromprogressing within their chosen career. In many instances, employersin prestigious sectors would disqualify applicants regardless of thetime served in correctional or rehabilitation facilities. Therefore,recovering drug addicts were discriminated against by beingrestricted to employment in the drug and alcohol industries.
Furthermore, therespondent mentioned that he would prefer to work as an earlyintervention educator for troubled youth. His choice revealed thefact that many drug addicts usually begin experimenting withintoxicating substances at a young age. Their subsequent involvementin criminal activities would make them the primary targets of lawenforcement sweeps and raids. Consequently, early interventioneducation can save troubled youths from the life-long effects of druguse. In this respect, they can avoid the restrictions on employmentand career advancement.
Granted, the interviewee struggled to cope with the numerous ethicalissues that arose at the workplace. In particular, such factors wouldcustomarily violate boundaries in the working environment. Besides,he was perturbed by the inconsistency prevalent at his place ofemployment. Notably, persistent drug use interfered with anindividual’s daily activities. Hence, recovering addicts had tomanifest strict discipline to overcome their entrenched habits andtendencies. Consequently, it would be difficult for them to tolerateinconsistent decisions and practices. Furthermore, recovering addictspreferred to maintain the privacy of their employment records. Inareas where it was essential to provide personal information, someunscrupulous employees accessed the sensitive details contained inofficial work documents. Therefore, such confidential records wouldbe used to stigmatize the recovering addict.
Inevitably, therespondent was disillusioned by the absence of a policy on paid timeoff. Hence, employees would forego their monthly salaries if theywent on a vacation or took a leave of absence for personal reasons.Similarly, the organization did not have an allowance for workers,who must attend the funerals of close relatives. Besides, employeeswho worked on Saturday were never rewarded with overtime payments.Indeed, the company showed little regard for the efforts of itsworkers. Although the interviewee was pleased that he could meetclient needs, his employer did not show personal interest in hiswell-being. However, such inhumane treatment was motivated by theworker’s previous drug use. In this regard, the employer wasconfident that the interviewee would stick to his job since thelatter had few options. In fact, the manager considered himselfworthy of unbreakable loyalty since he took a chance by offeringemployment to the respondent. Such factors highlight the unfairtreatment suffered by recovering addicts in their workplaces.
The intervieweerevealed that he felt undervalued and unappreciated at hisemployment. In particular, the workplace was characterized by classdistinctions. Staff members segregated themselves such that new onesfelt shunned. Moreover, the organization lacked diversity among itsemployees. Consequently, the work schedule was monotonous anduninspiring. In addition, there was little opportunity for careeradvancement since the organization was a small, non-profit agency. Inthis respect, the company never pursued programs for expansion.However, the interviewer’s status as recovering addict prevents himfrom seeking work elsewhere.
This interviewhas influenced my approach to the social problem analysis paper invarious ways. Firstly, it has helped me to conduct more research onthe factors that lead to drug use among youths. The analysis has alsomotivated me to focus on the adverse effects suffered by bothunemployed and employed individuals. In addition, I have realized theimportance of considering the manager’s perspective with regards tohiring recovering addicts. While some organizations may choose tooverlook certain candidates, other firms may be forced to respectindustry standards. The interviewee’s experience has taught me thesubtle challenges faced by persons with criminal records. Inparticular, I have seen the prejudice that drives many employmentdecisions. Besides, I have learned the significance of cultivatingand maintaining beneficial relationships at the workplace. In manyinstances, employees are required to cooperate on various tasks.Hence, it would be helpful to ensure respectful interactions.
Nevertheless,there are several things that I would have done differently. Firstly,I would have arranged the interview in a secluded place such as thenearest city park. At the pizza shop, we had frequent interruptionsby workers desiring to clear our table and serve more drinks.Furthermore, the venue was a popular fixture with the interviewee’scoworkers. Therefore, he may have held back on some responses toprotect his reputation at his place of employment. Interviewsconducted without permission from the firm’s human resource managercould be legitimate grounds for probation or dismissal. Moreover, Iwould have asked auxiliary questions to acquire more information onsome responses. For example, I would have asked the interviewee toelaborate on the ethical dilemmas prevalent at his workplace. I wouldalso ask the recovering addict to describe the factors thatcontributed to his recovery from drugs.
In addition, Iwould like to know the qualities which the interviewee valued, asmanifested by his fellow workers. Conversely, he would also enlistthe traits that he disapproved among the firm’s personnel. Hence,the interviewee would reveal whether he was slightly tempted to usedishonest means in pursuit of favorable treatment. Additionally, Iwould like to inquire how the recovering addict secured his currentjob. I would also like to know how the respondent planned to addressthe ethical challenges experienced at his place of employment. Inthis respect, I would ask him to reveal whether he planned to holdeither formal meetings with the managers or informal discussions withhis coworkers.